Friday, October 19, 2007

Thanks For Your Help Larry, But...

"Our understanding is the way that the Sask. Party is reporting is the legal and correct way and today we're calling on (NDP Leader) Lorne Calvert to immediately disclose his hidden donation list," said (Nancy) Heppner, who is seeking re-election in Martensville."

This is why voters and union members no longer trust the NDP or the SFL.

The posts that started this latest NDP deception are here and here.

Read the Sask Party media release here...

UPDATE: This issue is being discussed right now on John Gormley Live

UPDATE: The issue been posted at Small Dead Animals

14 comments:

leftdog said...

Look .. your guy Wall said that he is going to go 'to war' with unions! You should not be surprised that when he says hateful crap like that about the men and women who go to work every day in Saskatchewan, pay their taxes and raise their kids, that there isn't going to be some kind of 'push back'.

And don't deny that Wall said what he said ... "WALL: You know what? And maybe you’ve phrased it right. I wish it weren’t the case, but maybe going to war is the way to phrase it."

So be as sanctimonious as you want. Wall declared war on working people who choose to bargain collectively in a union. Too bad that this gets in the way of his (and your) extreme right wing Pro Business ideology.

Your side declared the war and then you reinforce the war with this blog, by attacking your fellow citizens and neighbours who go to work every day.

Pavlov said...

("cry Havoc!, and let slip the dogs of war!": Shakespeare in Julius Ceasar.) Wow! that LeftDog sure sounds angry! wonder who let him slip? but methinks he doth sound angry too much! easy! down boy! settle down! take it easy! a little context may help!

Anonymous said...

Larry isn't too keen on talking about the scandal now that it has turned back on them, now is he?
The NDP lie so much, I don't even think they know what the truth is anymore.

leftdog said...

pavlov, I am a tad angry. Wall declares war on Labour - Labour pushes back as you would expect, and then guys like whoever runs this blog go after them for defending themselves.

What kind of a premier would Wall be when before he even is given the job by the electorate, he starts trying to divide people - and thinks in terms of 'going to war' with sectors of society. That is not generally the credentials of great leaders.

Anonymous said...

It was labour that declared war on the SaskParty long before the election. What I see Brad Wall doing is "pushing back" on Labour.
Its funny how the unions can dish crap out,but can't take anything that is dished right back at them.
Most unions execs doesn't care about their rank and file members, they only care about themselves.

FYI, I happen to be a union member myself and I totally support the SaskParty.

The NDP Boogeyman said...

Ahhh, leftdog. I was wondering how long it was going to be before you showed up.

This blog doesn't attack working men and women. But what it does expose is the lies and the manipulation of those same working men and women by the NDP and big unions.

And it's not as if there aren't plenty of examples that I am able to draw on.

And they just keep on coming. (And a lot of them are coming from union members fed up with being told lies)

Anonymous said...

Leftdog (or shall I call you Maddog?) I was making the point that you are feigning rage, that it's an act; and I also have to say that I was disturbed by the link you provide: it is reminiscent of many similar campaigns the world has seen in the past that target minorities with cartoonish half-truths in an attempt to foment hatred.

leftdog said...

The truth hurts .... deal with it.
When you declare War on people, don't be surprised when they fight back. You want to wage war against working people .... then you are a divisive force in our society not a positive one.

Anonymous said...

ha ha we got you now Larry and Leftdog. hehehehe!!!!!!!!!!

Louise said...

Where oh where did this phrase "working men and women" come from. I am a working woman. I have to work for many, many years to put food on my table and a roof over my head. I am not a member of a union now, thank God. In a few of the jobs I have had in my long working life, I have had to be a member of a union, although if I had had a choice, I certainly would not have chosen to belong. Are not the vast, vast majority of people out there in the work force "working"? Is the small entrepreneur not working (his or her butt off, at that)? Why is it that only in unionized places are we considered to be "working". The phrase and the concept behind it are straight out of the 19th century and are unbelievably STUUUUUUUPPPID.

Pavlov said...

I agree, Louise: Leftdog envisions a world where "the proletariat" are oppressed by the bourgeouisie. Peasants are oppresse by kulaks. This world only exists in a few developing minds on U campuses, and in N Korea and Cuba; other than that, you;re right, these are 19th concepts.
in response, Leftdog says GRRRRRRRRR!

Pavlov said...

If you analyze the language used by Leftdog, such as "divisive" & "war" and "sectors of society" and "fight back", and the aparent strength of his feelings (although I still think that he's pretending) I get the impression that he could be dangerous, or more accurately, some people that think like Leftdog but a little more zealously, could be dangerous. As I said, I found the link to be disrturbing, vile even; I don;t think that it's civilized political discourse, it is hate literature (I don;t think that I'm overstaiting it), propaganda in the same mold used by some very cuel and oppressive regimes in the past.

Anonymous said...

Leftdog is just angry because he knows that he will lose his $100 000 a year job as a legislative crony.

Too bad leftdog...you'll be bagging groceries with your union sisters Deb and Sandra on November 8th. Hahaha!

Louise said...

This world only exists in a few developing minds on U campuses,
====================
I think you mean devolving, didn't you?