I laughed out loud when I read this...
Now that is some incredible orchestration.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Just Because You're Paranoid, It Doesn't Mean They're NOT Out To Get You
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The website that exposes Saskatchewan NDP tactics, smear campaigns and voter misinformation
I laughed out loud when I read this...
Now that is some incredible orchestration.
Posted by
The NDP Boogeyman
at
7:39 AM
NDP BOOGEYMAN
Please send all NDP Boogeyman sightings to ndpboogeyman@gmail.com
All information contained below was received during the 2007 Saskatchewan election. New sightings will be posted above.
Kelvington/Wadena (November 05th) - Nursing home workers are being called by NDP operatives and being told that a Saskatchewan Party government would cancel their benefits and roll back their wages. - verified sighting
10 comments:
Damned good idea, if you ask me. LOL!!
thanks for promoting our blog!
As for conspiracy, how about the fact that John Gormley received a nice stipend from the liquor store but never did any work?
or are right-wingers too afraid to ask for the real truth - they just like being fed lies?
it's public info... look through Hansard, friend...
because we're hunting for the truth, and you're merely... well, just being partisan.
That was a blog? I thought it was the AirFarce web site.
Your statement about a liquor board stipend is in no way partisan at all. I can see you're purely non-political.
However, I do find it odd that that comment is a talking point right from NDP song book.
Secondly, could you please explain what your comment has to do with the post?
(By the way, your comment has been sent to Mr. Gormley to be verified, via his JGL email address. I believe he's a fan of this blog.)
Finally, I don't pretend to be non-partisan. If you can read the sub-title of the blog, I'm out to expose the NDP. That sounds pretty partisan to most people.
You say you're non-partisan, but you prove otherwise with just one comment. Do you think making the statement that you are not partisan makes you so?
I'm proud of my beliefs. Why aren't you?
And you're welcome for the traffic. You needed it...
JG and the Sask Party coordinate a break in at an old man's house for political gain? Would you listen to yourself Sasquatch? Perhaps Sasquatch should take off the tin foil hat for a few minutes to let his head breath. Don't worry, I'm sure CSIS and the CIA won't mind turning off the mind control waves while you do this.
1) I'm so delighted you and Gormley have a personal relationship. Perhaps you will ask him directly what no one will, including the NDP, why he did no work for the Sask Liquor Board in the 80s and yet felt no problem taking the cash. Read up from the Public Accounts analysis of the booze scandals of the 80s and you'll find it... it's not hard, are you afraid of a little honest research into the truth?
2) since when is such a comment about Gormley from the NDP songbook - please show me a reference to the NDP that mentions this? please?
3) Partisanship is about defending a party. You're the one promoting Sask Party events. I'm merely exposing how useless the Sask Party is.
4) the relevance speaks for itself - you wanted to know why there was a comment about Gormley's radio show when that was entirely the point of my post.
5) since when am I looking for traffic? you assume too much, lad.
1) If this is a matter that's important to you, rather than post it on a blog, why don't you call John's show and ask him directly? 1-877-332-8255. I'd like to hear that...
2) You don't understand the the concepts of "talking points" obviously
3) Partisanship is not only about "defending a party". Look it up.
4) There was no relevance to your original comment and the post. Unless of course you think when anyone's name is brought up, it means you can say anything about that person. The word "the" was used in both posts, therefore they must be connected.
5) As much as I see your disingenous comment about traffic, traffic is not something you'll have to worry about, seeing the content of your blog (which also reflects the intellect of the owner).
I've tried calling Gormley - he won't take my call! I'm so sad!!!! It breaks my heart.
You like asking me to look up definitions. Have you bothered to look up the free cash that Gormley received while in law school? Have you?
Just to show I'm a fair and reasoned, here's the definition of partisanship for you:
Partisanship (Merriam-Webster)
1: a firm adherent to a party, faction, cause, or person; especially : one exhibiting blind, prejudiced, and unreasoning allegiance
"unreasoning allegiance", my friend, would be the way you defend the Sask Party. I don't show that defense to anyone but my own political views. You may have come to observe that, had you not been so hell-bent on insulting my intellect (which, by the way, not that it matters, is much higher than yours.)
sasquatch,
I doubt Gormley won't take you call... Try again
(There he goes any promoting this blog again, as I write this... What a coincidence! I must be doing something right)
That being said, when you promote your blog as the "Truth" and not partisan, but are markedly partisan (by your own definition), that is a fairly significant indicator of a "lack of intellect".
You don't even know your own truth.
But don't take my word for it. Trust your traffic count ...
One more thing about your "much higher intellect", sasquatch.
The difference between my blog and your is I attack parties and policies, not individuals. You do.
I am openly partisan. You claim not to be, but in fact are.
If I were a person of a "much higher intellect" like yourself, I probably wouldn't attack a lawyer publicly (Gormley) with potentially libelous information on a blog, then not have to "much higher intellect" to conceal your actual identity
Domain thesasquatch.ca
Status: EXIST
Organization: Jeff Cliff
Date approved: 2007/02/06
Last changed: 2007/02/06
Renewal Date: 2008/02/06
Registrar: (10dollar.ca) 10 Dollar Domain Names Inc.
Description:
DNS1: ns1.schnits.org
DNS2: ns2.schnits.org
How's that whole "much higher intellect" thing going for you, Jeffie?
Brilliant...
Post a Comment